Today: Feb 28, 2026

World Economic Forum President Borge Brende Resigns Following Scrutiny Over Jeffrey Epstein Ties

2 mins read

The World Economic Forum has entered a period of significant leadership transition following the announcement that Borge Brende will step down from his role as president. This departure comes at a sensitive time for the international organization, which has recently faced intense internal and external pressure regarding historical associations with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. While the forum has long attempted to distance itself from the controversies surrounding Epstein, recent internal inquiries have brought the matter back to the forefront of the global conversation.

Brende, a former Norwegian Foreign Minister, has been a central figure in the Davos landscape for years, helping steer the organization through the complexities of the pandemic and the subsequent shift in global geopolitical dynamics. His leadership was marked by an effort to modernize the forum and expand its reach into emerging markets. However, the shadow of past associations has proven difficult to escape. The decision for Brende to vacate his position follows a series of reports and internal probes into how deeply Epstein was integrated into the elite circles that frequent the annual gathering in the Swiss Alps.

Investigators have been looking into the extent of communication and logistical support provided to Epstein during the years he was a fixture at high-profile international events. For an organization that prides itself on ‘improving the state of the world,’ the optics of any link to a convicted sex offender are devastating. The scrutiny intensified after several prominent board members and corporate partners reportedly raised concerns about the reputational risks posed by unresolved questions surrounding the Epstein era. This internal friction made Brende’s continued leadership increasingly untenable as the forum seeks to maintain its status as the premier venue for global cooperation.

In his official departure statement, Brende focused on the achievements of his tenure, citing the growth of the forum’s impact initiatives and its role in mediating international trade discussions. He did not explicitly detail the specifics of the investigation in his farewell remarks, opting instead to emphasize the need for fresh perspectives in the leadership suite. Despite this diplomatic framing, insiders suggest that the board felt a clean break was necessary to preserve the integrity of the institution ahead of upcoming global summits.

Critics of the World Economic Forum have seized on the news as evidence of a lack of transparency within elite global institutions. For years, the Davos meetings have been a target for those who believe that the concentration of power among a small group of billionaires and politicians leads to a lack of accountability. The Epstein connection serves as a potent symbol for these critics, representing a failure of vetting and a culture of silence that allowed problematic figures to operate within the highest echelons of society.

As the search for a successor begins, the World Economic Forum faces the daunting task of rebuilding trust with its global stakeholders. The next president will not only need to navigate a fractured geopolitical landscape but will also be tasked with implementing more rigorous ethical standards for participants and leadership alike. There is a growing consensus among the forum’s trustees that the organization must move beyond the ‘clubhouse’ atmosphere of the past and adopt the transparency of a modern international body.

This resignation marks the end of an era for Brende and a crossroads for the World Economic Forum. Whether the organization can successfully pivot away from these scandals and refocus on its core mission of global problem-solving remains to be seen. For now, the focus remains on the fallout from the Epstein investigation and what it reveals about the inner workings of the world’s most powerful networking event. The transition is expected to take place over the coming months, with an interim leadership team slated to manage operations until a permanent replacement is found.